![]() | You are viewing Log in Create a LiveJournal Account Learn more | Explore LJ: Life Entertainment Music Culture News & Politics Technology |
| These are their memes. Which is nice. 20 most recent entries |
I get briefings from a company in Sweden we've done work with (www.ts.se). And naturally they're in Swedish. I think Swedish is a great language.
My God! Someone else noticed how intensely weird that recent Marmaduke strip was. Thank you Colin for sending this to me!I'm about to leave for my mini-tour of British Columbia and Minnesota. Click here for details about where I'll be and when. And remember severe punishment awaits anyone who is anywhere near these gigs and fails to show up. I wouldn't risk it if I were you! I just finished reading Chuck Klosterman's new book Eating The Dinosaur. Towards the end of the book he puts forth an interesting argument. He points out that human beings have been on Earth for around 130,000 years and that the first ever commercial film, The Great Train Robbery, was made in 1903. He says, "For roughly 129,900 years any moving object a human saw was actually real. It was there in front of you. If a man in 1850 saw a train chugging toward his face, it was an actual train." He argues that visceral, real understanding of these manipulated images lags way behind our intellectual understanding of them. "Intellectually we know the difference between a real person and a Facebook profile... but is there any possible way 129,900 years of psychological evolution can be altered within the span of a single century?" I think this is an extremely important point. I will be the first to admit that even I sometimes -- no, make that often -- respond to manipulated fake images, particularly on the Internet, as if they were real things. It is very confusing and disorienting. Which is why I spend as little time on the Internet as I can. And given my current job, I have to be on here a lot more than I really want to be. I'd probably be far more successful if I were on the Internet more. But it gets to me after a while and I need to run away. I know I've been harping on my antipathy towards so-called "cyber-sanghas" way too much. But that's because what I do here is so often confused with that concept, in both overt and subtle ways. It's also why I refuse to get involved with any cyber-sanghas. The experience is not at all the same as dealing with real human beings face to face. No more so than cyber-sex is the same as real sex. You can get very lost in the twisty twirly world of Internet communication and easily lose sight of what's real and what's not. These days I often hear people say,"I was talking with my friend..." And I'll ask, "Were you actually talking with that person or were you chatting online?" Often it's the latter. There is an enormous difference between these two activities. Yet many people these days seem to regard them as being essentially the same thing. I'm keenly aware of this because so much of what I do is in the form of written communication either here on this blog, in my books or thru a million emails I have to write each day. Often when I meet people who only know me through these forms of communication are really surprised when they encounter me in person. I am not at all what they expected. You don't get the tone of voice I would say these words in. You don't get my facial expression. You don't get the smell of my breath. You don't get the subtle electrical energy that human beings exchange when they're near each other. There are far more missing elements than I can possibly list. All of these things matter a lot. To dismiss them as if they were nothing very important is a terrible thing. The difference is the same as the difference between seeing a real train speeding towards you and seeing film of a train speeding towards a camera. Whatever. Anyway, Klosterman also says about an article on the NY Times website, "When the article was posted online, dozens of people hurled childish, ad hominem insults against the writer in the comments section -- a phenomenon that now happens when almost anything interesting is published in public." Yeah! So maybe this blog isn't so unique. Still, I'm gonna keep commenting switched off for now. OK. Well, I'm off for the Great White North. I'll try and post updates as the tour progresses. See you in Canada! You can comment here post a comment
I think we all know that Daily Failers live on another planet, but this article by Quentin Letts - taken from his fourthcoming book 'Bog-Standard Britain' - is so out of touch I was almost sick with laughter. In a gutter. While having an abortion. With my belly hanging rather unbecomingly over my appallingly low waistband. And it's all Germaine Greer's fault. Yes, ladies, it's 'first ladette' Greer we have to thank for binge drinking, casual sex, high heels, violence against women, teenage pregnancies, the breakdown of holy matrimony, the loss of good ol' fashioned feminine demureness and the prospect of more women dying at sea should a large cruise liner hit an iceberg any time soon: When the RMS Titanic sank in 1912, a large proportion of the female passengers survived, but 80 per cent of the men on board went down with the ship, doomed by chivalry. They had observed the code of 'women and children first' to the lifeboats. In a nutshell, Letts' article is the classic 'feminists made women shag around so men don't need to bother trying to be nice to them any more and everything's gone down the shitter' argument. There's a whole raft of quotable bollocks to choose from (women drink to try and 'show how free they are', anyone?) but my absolute favourite is his take on marriage: In Shakespeare's day the gap-toothed country girl offering easy pleasure would later exact her price - the ball and chain of marriage. Because becoming a lifelong domestic and sexual servant really worked to the woman's advantage, eh? I for one am downright disappointed that I no longer have to pledge my life and my vagina away just to get a bit of late night hanky panky. Damn you Greer! And damn you again for destroying chivalry, the only thing preventing those wild, brutish men from punching me in my alcohol-ravaged face: Hedonistic? Exciting? Novel? Daring? Germaine Greer's glory days were all of those. But the loss of dignity they entailed meant that the standing of women deteriorated. Like many misogynists, Letts seems to have almost as little faith in men as he does in women. (And like many Daily Fail writers, he has no concept of the difference between a rise in the reporting of crime and an actual rise in criminal activity.) I almost feel sorry for the man. post a comment
And, in a break from talking about Til Schweiger, I'm going to see Steeleye Span next month! Complete with Maddy Prior!
Dear Til Schweiger,
I was very anxious before writing my first post here, but when the comments starting rolling in, I was overwhelmed by the positive messages in response to it. Firstly, it really helped me. The encouragement that I am doing ok, I am doing good things, and I am making a difference, even if I can't necessarily do the 'outside' things. And secondly, that it touched so many people. Not especially that my words helped, but that talking about disability and feminism seems such a rarity, and that many people were reading about it for the first time. I'm so glad I could do that, and I'm so glad that it provoked thought for some and reassurance for others, but we need much more! I mentioned on my main blog that I had posted here, and one of the commenters there said, Isn't it a shame that writing about disability and feminism and inclusivity is something that is still a remarkable thing? And she's right! Feminism and activism really needs to catch up, and really address this. I appreciate that some groups have limited resources, or not much choice of venue, but seriously, if you are a feminist group and you are not meeting in an accessible place, what are you thinking? Would you meet somewhere that excluded other groups of women? Some kind of white-only venue? You wouldn't, because, even if the founding members of the group were all white, you would know instantly and instinctively that this went against every human and feminist value you have ever held. You would not want to associate yourself with a venue like that, nor would you want to support that venue in any way. If you did meet there, that would give out a message to black women that they were not welcome, so they would not enquire about the group, which might give you the impression that black women did not want to join the group, so it was ok, for the moment, to meet there. This might eventually give you the false impression that actually, meeting in a white-only venue wasn't so bad, black feminists weren't trying to join so it was less of an issue than you had predicted, and after all, the room hire is free. You know, reading that, that it's wrong! And meeting in an inaccessible venue is the same. Even if no disabled feminists have enquired about the group, this may be because they know they can't use that venue. Or maybe they even turned up, waited outside for a while when they couldn't get in, then went back home. What if one of your regular members becomes disabled? Will they be no longer welcome? However, overall there was a really positive message from the commenters to my original post, which is that online activism is relevant, is important, and does make a difference. Raising awareness, taking action and sharing stories and experiences can all be done extremely successfully online, and even more effectively than in real life at times. This is a good reminder to me, and to all the women who responded who also have limited spoons, whose uses have to be carefully chosen. Kitt, in the comments, said I know disabled feminists have a lot to offer - we have been forced to plumb the depths of our ingenuity to do the things we want to, using as few spoons as possible, and to choose our battles because we simply have to prioritise everything, everyday. Feminism has always benefited from the ingenuity of women - letting disabled people in will only add to this. We are another voice in the choir that will make the song sweeter and stronger.post a comment
Rae and Adam invited us and Fluffy for dinner on Saturday to say thankyou to Mike and Fluffy for being bridesmaids. So we got the train to Cardiff arriving late Saturday afternoon with just time to take the dog for a muddy 45 minutes walk before it got dark. Dinner was lovely, with good company and much playing of estimation whist and then hearts after dinner. On Sunday we got up and out of the house about 10:30 and took the dog for another much longer walk, about 2.5 hours with me on the lead for much of the time. I'm still surprised such a small dog is so strong, and so hard to wear out! We ended up with a nice walk along the cliffs though, and Mike and Monster made it down to the beach, although it was a bit too muddy for the rest of us to attempt. We finished off the weekend with a cheap and very plentiful lunch in the pub, and a lovely pint of Brains Dark, before Adam dropped us at the station. Having gone all that way it seemed like a good idea to take a couple of days off work and go visit Mike's parents too. So we got a train to Newport, and the bus to Chepstow and a lift home from there to their house, for a lovely curry for dinner and much amusement for me with Gina's Wii Fit Plus: I've already put a copy on my amazon wishlist but Mike now tells me I may need to remove it again :) After dinner Evan dropped us at Phil's house for a pleasant evening of gossip and Rock Band. On Monday we got up late and headed out after breakfast at nearly 12 for a nice little bike ride. 23.1 miles and 2100ft of climbing (and descending again!) in around three and a half hours rather completely wore me out, especially after all the walking the previous days. So we slumped on the sofa for the rest of the afternoon before trying to take Evan and Gina out for dinner. But despite us saying it could be a late birthday present to them they still insisted on paying for their half! It was lovely to see them anyway, and we had a nice time, and have spent today travelling home again without having to worry about anything more disruptive to the rail network than a cow on the line at Roydon leading to a 15 minute delay. Tired now! 2 comments | post a comment
Along with this, I took part in two discussions on BBC Three Counties Radio last week. The first was on Jonathan Vernon Smith's show and was about body hair, in the light of the Daily Mail's vicious and gleeful criticism of model Danielle Bux for daring to go out with hair showing under her arms. (The topic begins from 2.01.32 and my contribution comes in at 2.43.35.) Jonathan quite rightly suggested that it didn't matter whether or not Bux's body hair was intentional or the result of her "forgetting to shave" and pointed out that, while it's true that men are generally expected to shave their faces, people don't tend to look at them and say "ugh!" the way many of them unfortunately do when talking about body hair on women. However, he also said he hadn't heard from a male caller saying it was "disgusting" and brought up the apparent tendency for women to be the ones doing the disapproving during our discussion. I'm fairy sure there actually were some male callers making negative comments during the course of the show and, in any case, hairy women is sadly something I've seen women and men reacting badly to. Indeed, during a conversation before the show, Jonathan told me that Naomi Campbell had recently admitted to Jonathan Ross that she waxes her big toe, only for him to be taken aback that she even has it there in the first place! The second discussion I got involved in was on the Nine o' Clock show and was focused on the decision to replace Jerry Hall with the much younger Kelly Brook as the character "Celia" in a theatre production of Calendar Girls (0.04.40 and 1.05.30). Apart from naked calendars being extremely commonplace (i.e. banal rather than daring) at the moment and this not being helped by the rather obviously conventionally sexy slant being given by Brook, it also has to be said that the original plotline was about older women, so it seems decidedly suspect that a woman who is only just about to reach 30 should be in the cast. And that's just one of the issues. We didn't even get around to touching on a woman's greatest asset apparently being her looks and that the need for older women to be included in that in order to feel "fabulous", or whatever, is arguably flawed from the start... Photo by vår resa, shared under a Creative Commons Licence. post a comment
While its a bit chilly and dull here, i'm happy as i've been shopping! Went into M&S earlier as mum wanted a pair of the faux sheepskin ugg style boots that I got from there, and as I love mine so much decided to get a pair for when my current ones die. They're only £15 and much cheaper and comfier than my real cardy uggs (but they're purple so only come on a special occasion and I can wear these brown ones more often)
That's two unsolicited calls in three days from an illegal cold-calling agency calling itself the "Accident Investigation Bureau" which claims to be from the UK government despite the operative being a very thickly-accented Indian or Pakistani with a false English name who has absolutely no idea about who I am - it's news to me about having a car crash 12 years ago - and who cannot answer basic questions about his supposed employers. Withheld number of course, so TPS is useless here; does anyone know who they really are and how to get these monkeys off my back? Come to think of it, does BT have a facility by which withheld numbers can be blocked?
Thanks once again to Helen G who has compiled and coded the comments. Her help means this month's comments are up once again in a timely fashion :-) This month, Kate's piece on sexism in primary schools received lots of great responses. And, from the archive, Anne's article on how male privilege affects men's role in feminist activism got another interesting comment. Photo of an abandoned feminist surf school in Costa Rica is by linkzilla and shared on Flickr under a Creative Commons license post a comment
12 children got fingertips amputated before the recall.Yes, that's clearly the right number of irreversible accidents before it's not a coincidence.
Congratulate me - I've made it through the first page of Harry Potter und der Feuerkelch. Fear my awesome translating abilities.
![]() Got some new info about the upcoming tour. As always, the full schedule is over there to your left at the top of the LINKS section at the link titled Brad's Book Tour Dates. I'll be in St. Paul the following dates: • December 4, 2009 (Fri) 4:45pm Macalester College, 1600 Grand Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55105 at JBD Lecture Hall Buddhism and Sex (lecture) • December 5, 2009 (Sat) 9am - 1 pm Macalester College, 1600 Grand Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55105 USA Half-day Zazen sitting at the Macalester College Chapel with Dharma Talk • December 6, 2009 (Sun) 10 a.m., Dharma Field, 3118 W 49th St, Minneapolis, MN 55410, (corner of 49th and York) Dharma talk by Brad Warner, Suggested donation $15. Zazen: 8:00 a.m., 8:40 a.m., 9:30 a.m. www.dharmafield.org contact Bev Forsman, bev.forsman@dharmafield.org Also, one more date has been added to Vancouver: • November 15, 2009 (Sun) 1:00pm - 3:00pm Yoga for the People, #201-150 W. Hastings Street, Vancouver, BC Introduction to Zen Buddhism with Brad Warner And remember there are further gigs in Vancouver on November 13th and 14th, and in Victoria, BC November 17th, 19th and 22nd. Further info on these and other dates on the tour is on THIS LINK. Look at it. It was a pain in the ass to put together. AND BE THERE! I have just spent the entire morning and quite a bit of the afternoon attempting to write what I really think of Jukai. I FAILED MISERABLY and just trashed everything that I wrote. This is my second attempt. The first one a few weeks ago ended in a similar tragedy of wasted time and effort. So the Jukai article will have to wait. And can someone explain the Marmaduke cartoon I have posted? Even the Marmaduke Explained website hasn't touched this one, it's so surreal. Is it supposed to be surreal? I just don't know. It's like a koan... Go here to comment. post a comment
Episode 5 ( Spoilers! )Characters ( Updated ) 5 comments | post a comment
Portsmouth's Reclaim the Night is taking place on Wednesday 25th November. Meet at 7pm by Spinnaker Tower at Gunwharf. This Reclaim the Night is part of the White Ribbon Campaign, is supported by Portsmouth Football Club and is open to all (cis and trans) women, men and children. Womensgrid has more: Once again this is a real community response to domestic abuse and sexual violence and the Spinnaker tower will be coloured purple, we will be marching through Gun Wharf and then onto the streets of Portsmouth. At the Guildhall, we are hoping for refreshments and then the candle light vigil. We anticipate that the evening will end approximately 9pm.For further information, contact tonia.earey[at]portsmouthcc.gov.uk. post a comment
I am somewhere in East London, unable to make phone calls: the wonderful O2 network leaves my phone (and yours) hanging in the 'connecting' screen indefinitely - O2 calls in London frequently take more than a minute to connect, and often time out with 'call failed' at busy times - and the iPants has an particularly venomous incompetence: no-one in Cupertino anticipated that the network would be this bad, and there's no escape from the waiting state. If the network doesn't tell the handset that the call's failed, you've got a locked iPhone and it takes several minutes more to notice the soft-keys to power down.
Dear Everybody Involved With Making The Red Baron,
Dive Into HTML5. A free illustrated e-book that explains some of the features of HTML 5. Pretty Handy.
Just looked out of the window at work and its really really foggy. Its like a sheet of white, might not go jjb and opt for straight home instead as after the rain on friday totally causing traffic chaos, it might be the same today! 2 comments | post a comment |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||